One eye-catching detail is certainly worth noting. Andrew Watt has produced the album and has received co-writing credits of several songs. The recordings started in 2021 and continued for years. And let Watt also be the one who kicked life in Paul's contemporaries The Rolling Stones as well, with Paul playing bass on a song on 'Hackney Diamonds' and the upcoming album (10 July). Both dinosaurs of the beat, R&B and pop era still sound like themselves with Watt in the producer's seat, but certainly with a fresh sounding tinge. If not pure and pleasant surprises.
As I wrote before, Paul's voice is not what it used to be. It is in steady decline from overuse in the past decades, from 1957 right op to 2026, or sixty-nine(!) straight years. Where in the end that stopped me from playing 'McCartney III' more, his previous solo album from 2020. So far, I am not bothered much on The Boys Of Dungeon Lane. Somehow he manages to use his voice in different ways, where the wear and tear is less obvious. Strangely enough it is when he uses it in a mildly higher register.
Paul McCartney turns 84 in the coming weeks but there is not much suggesting his age. Again he played most of the instruments himself, only assisted here and there by Andrew Watt. Again an analogy with The Rolling Stones. Some of the lyrics look back at his youth, see eg 'Down South' about George Harrison I'd say and then we are talking about the 1950s. The album title is a street in Speke that led to the river Mersey, where boys went out to play. Something I can completely relate to, despite having grown up ten-fifteen years later. The adventures are sort of similar, as there wasn't much else to do then but explore the surrounding neighbourhoods.
Musically, The Boys Of Dungeon Lane is as varied as can be expected. From an acoustic ballad to a wild rocker, you'll find it on the album. With one of the highlights the duet with Ringo Starr, 'Home To Us', perhaps one of the most Beatlesque songs McCartney ever released or better, what The Beatles might have sounded had they all lived until 2026 and decided to make music together once more. Besides that, 'Home To Us' is so much alive, belying the age of the two protagonists. It deserves to be a hit, but certainly is in my universe.
From the opening song it is clear that Paul McCartney means business. 'As You Lie There' has a few faces to it. From the soft McCartney, to the harder rocking Paul. It is all there and more. This is the song by a man who was challenged to get more out of the original idea. It starts out oh so soft and nostalgic, with Paul sing-talking, looking back to a once upon a long ago. From quiet reminiscing to desperation, all within a minute. The accompaniment changes to something bordering a symphonic rock ballad. Next up is a great guitar solo and Paul shouting out his despair once again, and still more to come. It's clear this is a man on a mission and not just presenting us with another record. In a way, 'As You Lie There' reminds me of 'Band On The Run', because of all the changes.
The album continues with McCartney in a minor rocking mode. 'Lost Horizon' has a nice shuffle sound without overdoing it. Again he makes the most of his 2020s voice. It can be said that 'Lost Horizon' sounds familiar, but it has a freshness that I haven't heard for a long time from McCartney. All over the album there is a rock element that pops up and that makes all the difference for me. I'm quite convinced this is Andrew Watt's contribution. Next up is an acoustic song, that was the first single from the album, 'Days We Left Behind', holding the title to the album. Here it is that I wished his voice was better, because this is a really beautiful song and deserved his voice from twenty or more years ago. By the way, in 2026 it has become possible to miss a new Paul McCartney single, as no one alerted me to it.
Sure, there are a few songs in the typical McCartney style that appeals less to me, but they are not bad songs and that rock element that seeps in. As I read somewhere today, "this is as good as his best work in the past 50 years". That makes 'Silly Love Songs' as a single, when Paul still scored hits. Several songs can more than compete, so I agree with the writer. Like I said, it seems I need another bunch of silly Paul McCartney songs anyway. One question remains, reading about starting working with Andrew Watt in 2021, who came first, Paul or Mick c.s.?
Wout de Natris - van der Borght

No comments:
Post a Comment